Skip to main content
Be The Investor
BTI Market Newsstocks
Back to News

Cisco Offers More Dividend Cushion; IBM Offers More Income

Cisco Offers More Dividend Cushion; IBM Offers More Income

IBM's yield is higher, but Cisco's dividend uses less cash and its business is growing faster. The comparison turns on whether an investor needs income now or inflation-beating growth.

IBM pays more income today, while Cisco gives its dividend more room to grow. That is the useful distinction in a comparison that otherwise risks becoming a simple contest between two familiar technology names.

At the prices cited in the original analysis on October 27, IBM yielded 2.67% and Cisco 1.56%. IBM's annualized dividend was $6.76 a share, compared with $1.68 for Cisco. IBM also has the longer record: the company says its December 2026 payment will extend an unbroken run of quarterly dividends dating to 1916, and its 2026 increase was the 31st consecutive annual raise. Cisco has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years.

The growth rates tell a different story. From early 2024 through 2026, IBM's quarterly dividend moved from $1.66 to $1.69, an increase of roughly 1.8%. Cisco's rose from $0.39 to $0.42, about 7.7%. A higher starting yield can be valuable for an investor spending the income now, but a faster-growing payment has more chance of keeping pace with inflation over a long retirement.

Loading market context

Cash coverage also favors Cisco. The company paid about $6.6 billion in dividends in fiscal 2026 against $14.18 billion of operating cash flow, a ratio of about 47%. Its annualized dividend equals roughly one-third of the low end of fiscal 2027 non-GAAP earnings guidance of $5.05 to $5.11 a share. Cisco ended fiscal 2026 with $15.9 billion of cash and investments and had $8.1 billion remaining on its repurchase authorization.

IBM paid $4.8 billion in dividends during the first nine months of 2026 against about $8 billion of free cash flow, or 60%. It ended the third quarter with $11.1 billion of cash and $63.8 billion of debt, including $12.7 billion tied to its financing business, after spending $11.4 billion on acquisitions. IBM still generates enough cash to support the payout, but the margin for acquisitions, debt reduction and larger dividend raises is narrower.

Operating momentum widens the gap. Cisco's fiscal fourth-quarter revenue rose about 18% to $17.3 billion, product orders increased 35% and AI infrastructure orders reached $9.3 billion for the year. The trade-off was a lower gross margin as hardware became a larger part of the mix. IBM's third-quarter revenue rose about 5% to $17.1 billion. Software grew 8% as reported, but consulting was flat and IBM Z revenue fell 20%.

Cisco is not automatically the better stock at any price, and this comparison is not a new corporate catalyst. IBM remains the clearer choice for higher current income and lower share-price volatility. Cisco offers the stronger combination of cash coverage, recent dividend growth and operating momentum. The decision is therefore about the investor's time horizon, not which century-old company has the more impressive dividend history.

Continue your IBM research